Dr. Anne Marie Api, RIFM VP of Human Health Sciences, participated as a member of the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) LLNA Task Force. An article about the LLNA Task Force Report from ECETOC's most recent newsletter is reprinted here with their permission.
Building on previous ECETOC work, the task force was started in mid 2007 with the remit to:
The conclusion on the first remit is that although skin sensitising chemicals having high EC3 values may represent only relatively low risks for human health, it is currently not possible to define an EC3 value below 100% that would serve as an appropriate threshold for classification and labelling of substances as R43.
The task force also reviewed classification of contact allergens according to relative potency based on LLNA data. Specifically, the task force considered whether, in the light of developments since the original recommendations were made, there is reason now to revise those recommendations. Following these deliberations the task force concluded that the recommendation made previously for four sub-categories of skin sensitisation potency, i.e. 'extreme', 'strong', 'moderate' and 'weak' to reflect differing skin sensitisation potency based on derived EC3 values, is still the most appropriate classification scheme. The corresponding EC3 values are as given in the following table. The recommendations of an expert group of the (former) ECB (European Chemicals Bureau) are also given, although they have, as yet, not been accepted by any regulatory authority. For perspective, also under GHS the binary categorisation of skin sensitisation in the existing legislation remains, with a requirement to only indicate whether a substance is a sensitiser (Category 1) or not.
Proposed potency-based cut-off values for classification of skin sensitising substances
Potency rating ECETOC ECB
Concentration thresholds (%) Concentration thresholds (%)Extreme <0.1 <0.2
Strong >0.1 – <1.0 >0.2 - <2.0
Moderate >1.0 - <10 >2.0
Weak >10 N/A
Concerning classification and labeling of preparations, the task force made recommendations based on the potency of their individual substances, based on their direct testing and based on comparisons with similar preparations. For the first of these, which is likely the most common case, a proposal was made for potency-based cut-off values; the values are given in the next table. Applying those would provide improved classification and labeling compared with what is currently required by the Dangerous Preparations Directive and its amendment. According to the latter, a level of >1% of a skin sensitiser ingredient requires a hazard categorisation of the preparation as a skin sensitiser, irrespective of potency. For a quantity of >0.1% but <1%, the skin sensitising substance has to be declared on the label, even though the preparation is not classified as sensitising.
Proposed potency-based cut-off values for classification and labeling of preparations
Potency Sub-category Concentration limit of sensitising ingredient present
in solid and liquid preparation (% w/v)
Extreme 1a 0.003
Strong 1b 0.1
Moderate 1c 1.0
Weak 1d 3.0
To address the second remit, the task force reviewed recently published approaches for quantitative risk assessment of skin sensitising chemicals based on the relationship between the calculated exposure to a sensitising chemical and the acceptable exposure level. The first step in the quantitative risk assessment process is to establish a NESIL3. The task force concluded that EC3 values derived from the LLNA are well suited for the determination of a NESIL because the proliferation of cells in draining lymph nodes is related causally and quantitatively to the extent to which skin sensitisation will be acquired (potency).
With these recommendations regarding the use of potency considerations based on EC3 values, the LLNA is not only a component of hazard identification but can also be considered a key component of risk assessment.
1effective concentration for a stimulation index of 3 in proliferation of lymph node cells;
2local lymph node assay;
3no expected sensitisation induction level
The report of this task force has been published and can be found in the Publications section of the ECETOC web site as Document No. 46. Go to http://www.ecetoc.org/publications.
*reprinted by permission of the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC)