• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Research Institute for Fragrance Materials logoResearch Institute for Fragrance Materials logoResearch Institute for Fragrance Materials logo
Sign In
Access denied. You are not a member.
Menu
  • Home
  • RIFM
    Science
    • Back to main menu
    • Back to
    • Overview
    • Safety Assessment
    • RIFM Research
    • RIFM Database
    • Expert Panel
  • About
    Us
    • Back to main menu
    • Back to
    • Overview
    • Leadership Teams
    • Member Benefits
    • Board of Directors
    • Careers
  • Ask a RIFM
    Scientist
  • News +
    Events
  • Contact
    Us
Sign In
Access denied. You are not a member.
  • Fragrance
    Material Safety
    Resource Center
Join RIFM
Join RIFM

News + Events

Forceps probing a bright flower held by a hand in a medical glove

Follow This: The art, science, and subjectivity of smell

4.6.22

How is it that we perceive smell? Does everyone experience scent similarly?

On Monday, Science Daily reported on research into the neural activity that translates into our sense of smell. The paper, by Zhen Chen and Krishnan Padmanabhan of the University of Rochester Medical Center, was recently published in Cell Reports.

The Science Daily article highlights Chen and Padmanabhan’s focus on two very different ways that we experience smell:

“These processes suggest the brain has multiple responses to representing a smell. In one strategy, the brain uses a snapshot, like a painting or a photograph, at a given moment to capture the essential features of the odor. In the other strategy, the brain keeps track of the evolving patterns. It is attuned to which cells turn on and off and when—like a symphony.”

Chen and Padmanabhan’s research compliments earlier work by the Monell Chemical Senses Center. According to a 2019 article by Science Daily, Monell’s research, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, explored:

“the extensive individual differences in how we sense odors … how small changes in a single olfactory receptor gene … affect how strong and pleasant a person finds an odor.”

“The Monell and Rochester studies reveal the subjective nature of our experience of smell,” said Nikaeta Sadekar, PhD, Senior Scientist at the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM). Dr. Sadeker heads RIFM’s Respiratory Toxicology endpoint and leads a research project in collaboration with Monell to study human odor thresholds—how little of something needs to be present for our scent receptors to detect it.

“This research underscores how sensitive we are to smell,” Dr. Sadekar explained. “In other words, when you smell something, the exposure is not necessarily very high. For instance, we know that the exposure to more than 99% of all current fragrance materials across all cosmetics, air care, personal care, and household cleaning products that a person uses falls below the most conservative inhalation Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) of 470 µg/person/day. Therefore, not even the highest users of fragranced products are putting themselves at any appreciable risk of harm. The odor threshold research RIFM is conducting with Monell, like the earlier Monell and Rochester work, will help refine our understanding of the sensitivity of the sense of human smell.”

Read more: If I can smell it, is it safe?

View all news

Media Contact

RIFM Communications

Contact media

sidebar

sidebar-alt

Footer

RIFM News

5.15.25
RIFM Scientists Advance Animal-Free Genotoxicity Testing with New Study on CEGA Model

Events

5.9.25
Save the Date: RIFM's 59th Annual Meeting is on the move!

Recently Published

4.8.25
Responses of an In Vitro Coculture Alveolar Model for the Prediction of Respiratory Sensitizers (ALIsens®) Following Exposure to Skin Sensitizers and Non-Sensitizers

Follow Us

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2025 Research Institute for Fragrance Materials. All rights reserved.